In the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, there has been a renewed focus on the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.
This amendment protects Americans’ right to bear arms. Some people argue that all people should have the right to own guns, while others believe this right should be used responsibly.
This blog post will discuss how all people should have the right to own guns and affect society.
What Are All People Who Should Have the Right to Own Guns Debate?
All people should have the right to own guns debate is a political debate about whether or not all individuals have the right to bear arms.
This debate is crucial because it affects our society and the way we function as a society. The discussion has been around for a long time, and there are various sides to it.
Why Do Some People Believe That All People Should Have the Right to Own Guns?
Some people believe that all people should have the right to own guns because they think this would protect them from crime. They argue based on some reasons like
-
Guns Don’t Kill People; People Kill People.
The argument states that only a person (not an inanimate object) can commit murder and no gun on its own is more likely to be dangerous than any other consumer product.
In other words, it doesn’t matter where you put a gun; someone who has the intent will find a way to cause harm.
Guns make people feel safe that they have one correlate with lower murder rates in the areas where guns are prevalently owned (guns don’t kill guns owners do). An individual who owns a handgun or firearms for protection may decide not to leave his house if not for his firearm as it would make him feel much more secure as he fears intruders might break into his home.
That also means that cities with more restrictions on weapons would have comparatively higher rates of violence, especially by young males, since they will much more likely participate in street shootings, assaults, and robbery, which has very little organizational support.
-
Gun Possession Is Too Widespread to Be Reversed.
More than a third of American adults currently live-in homes with firearms, and many more have access to weapons outside the home.
Humans have an innate need for protection.
Humans are political animals, and we have an innate need for protection from those with whom we disagree – be it a disagreement about politics or just not agreeing at all. Conflict usually leads to aggression which has been with humans since we started speaking.
There is simply no way around this issue; guns are not going away because people don’t feel protected without them by their side and nobody else but the government can guarantee protection; legally owning a firearm isn’t a privilege but rather a right of every citizen in America if you take gun control to its logical end.
-
Banning Guns Will Only Increase Their Demand in the Black Market.
When forbidden from owning firearms, individuals possessing firearms are no different from other people who want something very much but can’t.
Therefore, there will always be a market for stolen and smuggled guns, just like drugs and other illegal and restricted goods. Although gun control produces opposite results, banning drugs never killed the demand (purchases). The black-market trade in illicit goods is pretty well controlled, contrary to prostitution prohibition.
-
They Are an Excellent Tool for Self-Defense.
Guns are great tools for self-defense because they instantly give those that carry a feeling of security and safety. More people have been protected and killed with their guns (though sometimes by accident) than any other weapon.
Generally, when guns aren’t outlawed, everyone feels safe, but they are allowed. There is enough workforce to keep others from killing or stealing from people. Within reason, of course, you can also not own a gun for some other reason if you want.
Still, it is easier for desperate people to get a weapon out of someone’s house than someone’s house being broken in and stealing it since many places don’t lock their doors or require a key or even money from the homeowner to gain access inside.
Guns are a better self-defense tool than a ring on your finger- If your life is threatened, you are thrown against the wall into fear.
Most of the time, criminals don’t attempt shooting because any idiot can stab you sometimes in a short period, even with a knife, which results in death within minutes!
Therefore, possession of firearms more often reduces home robberies and assaultive crimes like rape both by family members and strangers.
-
Countries That Have Gun Regulations Have More Crime.
The rates and intensity of assaults, robberies, and other serious crimes are significantly higher in many Western European countries with stricter gun control measures than in the U.S.
One hot example would be Finland, a country with one of the highest gun ownership rates in entire Europe, with a murder rate of 0.8 per 100,000 compared to Brazil, which only possesses a slave population /worked to death without care/ of 10%.
In contrast, its murders (others are suicides, though) stood at 22.2!
The link There you can see that either some countries besides America learn how to keep stats better than others or there less crime because they have more minor criminals.
-
It Takes a Good Guy to Stop a Bad Guy With a Gun.
An armed citizen will have a real chance of stopping a crime or mass shooting before the police arrive.
If someone tries to massacre innocent people, they should be revoked of their rights as citizens of this country due to their crime(s); thus, their freedom is taken from them until the police solve the case, no matter how long it would take without action from those who are victims.
Frequently Asked Questions
1) How Do All People Having the Right to Own Guns Debate Affect Our Society?
All people should have the right to own guns debate affects our society in many ways.
First, it creates a divide in our community. Some people believe that all people should have the right to own guns.
Others believe that this right should only be given to those who can use them responsibly.
This debate has hurt relationships between different groups in our society.
2) What Are Some Potential Consequences of the All People Should Have the Right to Own Guns Debate?
There are a few potential consequences of the all people should have the right to own guns debate. For example, it could lead to more gun-related accidents.
People who cannot get firearms may be forced to violence to protect themselves. This could lead to more homicides and suicides in society.
Additionally, it could result in the militarization of society. The rise of the military and the increased number of shootings could increase gun-related mass shootings.